08 May 2009

Curves Members Protest Opening of Men-Only Gym

In a scene ripped straight out of the 1960s, dozens of women converged to picket a newly opened men-only gym.

Engines is the newest gym to open in the Atlanta general metro area, and it's already garnered much criticism. Most of those to protest the exclusivity of the men-only gym are members of Curves, the nation's fastest growing work-out facility.

Signs wagging on the protesters' frontline include such messages as "Go back to the Fifties, Ward!" "Chauvinism is dead!" and "Exclusivity is bigotry."

The founder of Engines admits that he's quite confused as to why he's attracted so much negative attention. "I started this gym for pretty much the same reason that Curves was started," says Jim Halleran.

Mr. Halleran has the classic "tall, dark and handsome" features ladies are said to desire. He says that half the time he went to work out at his former co-ed gym, he was approached by women. Halleran, who has been happily married for nearly 20 years, explained that he doesn't wear his wedding ring while working out. "The absence of my wedding band seemed to signal to the ladies in the gym that I was open game. Even after I told them, some would continue to press me and tell me that they didn't mind that I was married."

In the locker room, Halleran would often speak with or overhear conversations that indicated a need for a men's only gym. "I'd hear some guy express his overwhelming sense of insecurity when working out in front of women. Other fellows would comment on how every time they brought out Sports Illustrated, Maxim, or some other male-oriented magazine, some woman would inevitably harass him about his macho reading choices."

Ultimately, Halleran wanted to create a gym where men can be men. This decision has been met with incredible resistance from the female populus in the area surrounding Engines.

One female protester said, "Gentlemen clubs were outlawed in the 80's and 90's for a good reason. Men used their exclusive clubs to oppress women and minorities. Their day has come and gone, and opening Engines is an attempt to return our society to that oppressive culture."

When presented with this statement, Halleran said, "I knew that I would catch heat for opening an all-male gym. I expected it. Although I have no plans on opening membership to women, we do not limit membership based on ethnicity. In fact less than 40% of our members are Anglo in their ancestry."

As one member of Engines was confronted by a protester, he declared his intention to apply to join Curves. The protester stood aghast and replied, "Why? So you can stare at my tits, you pig?"

Curves has yet to file any charges against Engines, but rumor has it that the corporation may sue Halleran on grounds of Trademark infringement. Halleran said he's prepared for a long and spendy trial, and he has contacted the ACLU for help with his case. The ACLU has yet to respond to Halleran's request.

Note: This is a satirical piece. None of this is real, but it is loosely based on similar incidents. I thought the "satire" tag would clue folks in. Alas, it did not so I am posting this small print to cover my butt in case a protest/boycott results from what I have written.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm a woman, and a former member of a Curves-type gym. I am shocked at the reaction that some of the members have regarding a mens-only gym. My husband has often expressed a desire see a mens-only fitness facility..simply because at many co-ed gyms, the women who come in there are often very scantily dressed, and he would rather not have that kind of distraction. If he's at the gym, he's there to work out. If these women are all about equality, and want their "womens only" gyms, then the guys should be able to have theirs too.

Anonymous said...

I think Curves should just shut up about it until they begin letting men into their gyms. Why is it ok for "women only" gyms, but not 'men only"? Give it up ladies! I am with the other folks, I don't want to see all those women exposing themselves.

Anonymous said...

I am a woman and a member of Fernwood- a Women's only gym in Melbourne (Australia). I also consider myself a feminist. But thanks to sexist, self righteous misguided women of the type who protest a 'men's only gym' the term feminist has a negative and unflattering connotation. I came upon this blog whilst searching for a men's only gym in Melbourne for my partner who is very insecure about going to a co-ed gym. Consequently he does not work out at all even though he both needs to lose weight and improve his health. Sigh!

les said...

Why has nobody asked these women about their hypocritical attitude towards a men’s only gym?

Kyle Stich said...

Oh boy! I should have checked the comments on here sooner. Sorry for the confusion, folks. This was a satirical post loosely based on actual events.

Should you ever encounter this actually happening in your area, I would love to help spread the word for you. Let me know.

Anonymous said...

Kyle-this actually HAS happened in the US-check out some of the California state lawsuits on the subject where gyms had "female only" and "co-ed" facilities-but no "male only" facilities.

It also happened recently where I live-and the attempt at a male only gym shut down because of it.

Anonymous said...

Has anyone noticed the growing number of unisex toilets popping up? perhaps we should start picketing them for the return of male/female toilet. As a bloke I would like nothing more than people to be able to go where they are comfortable to workout or go to the toilet. i have been shouted out of a change room before because it was attached to a women's bathroom. Where was i suppose to change my lad? There wasn't a mens only baby change room.